
How Can Athletes Be Helped
in Order to Keep Violence Off the Court?
by Clair Alvies
Everyone knows that there is violence in sports. The
question is what is being done about it? One clear example of the way
the NBA is dealing with violence has become headline news in the last
month. In December of 1997 the NBA's league commissioner David Stern suspended
Golden State Warrior Latrell Sprewell for one year because of his attack
on head coach P.J. Carlesimo. Sprewell also lost his $32 million contract
with the Warriors and his shoe contract with Converse.
Actions that are being taken against professional athletes
involving violent acts both on and off the court are becoming more prominent
in recent years. Longer suspensions, higher fines, and now even the thought
of being suspended for a year have become the ways in which leagues are
dealing with their professional athletes. Even though many players have
had to pay the price of committing acts of violence, is this type of punishment
really going to change things in the long run? Athletes who hold the same
opinion as Charles Barkley are the ones who make finding a solution difficult.
"I don't care if I get fined. I make $3 million. What's a couple of thousand
dollars?" Attitudes like this may soon be changing due to the actions
that were taken against Latrell Sprewell.
What are other ways of reducing the number of incidents
that involve violence in sport? The focus should be on the ways of counteracting
against aggression. In reviewing the literature four main components that
impact sport behavior and can create changes in the field were identified:
management, media, coaches, and athletes. The solution to the problem
of violence in sport is not a simple one. It involves many components,
but researchers' recommendations proposed in the literature, and by The
International Society of Sport Psychology, if implemented, can start the
process of keeping violence out of sports or at least reduce the problem
of violence and aggression in the athletic domain. The International Society
of Sport Psychology has made the following nine recommendations based
on research conducted by sport psychologists (Yeagher, 1979; Cox, 1985;
Freishlag & Schmidke, 1979; Lefebvre, Leith, & Bredemeier, 1980; Mark,
Bryant, & Lehman, 1983; Leunes & Nation, 1989).
Recommendation 1: Management should make fundamental
penalty revisions so the rule-violating behavior results in punishments
that have greater punitive value than potential reinforcement.
Recommendation 2: Management must ensure proper coaching
of teams, particularly at junior levels, which emphasizes a fair play
code-of-conduct among all participants.
Recommendation 3: Management should ban the use of alcoholic
beverages at sporting events.
Recommendation 4: Management must make sure facilities
are adequate regarding catering and spacing needs and the provision of
modern amenities.
Recommendation 5: The media must place in proper perspective
the isolated incidents of aggression that occur in sport rather than make
them "highlights."
Recommendation 6: The media should promote a campaign
to decrease violence and hostile aggression in sport which will also involve
the participation and commitment of athletes, coaches, management, officials,
and spectators.
Recommendation 7: Coaches, managers, athletes, media,
officials, and authority figures should take part in workshops on aggression
and violence to ensure they understand the topic of aggression, why it
occurs, the cost of aggressive acts, and how aggressive behavior can be
controlled.
Recommendation 8: Coaches, managers, officials, and
the media should encourage athletes to engage in prosocial behavior and
punish those who perform acts of hostility.
Recommendation 9: Athletes should take part in programs
aimed at helping them reduce behavioral tendencies toward aggression.
The tightening of rules, imposing of harsher penalties, and changing of
reinforcement patterns are only part of the answer to inhibiting aggression
in sport. Ultimately, the athlete must assume responsibility for his or
her behavior.
By incorporating these ideas with the development of
an athlete the focus can be on the skills that it takes to be successful
without the use of violence.
Outside of wartime, sports is the only setting where
violence and aggression are not only tolerated but also encouraged and
rewarded by members of the society. In recent years violence in sport
has become a social problem and should be treated as such.
If Latrell Sprewell worked at any other job and had
assaulted his boss, he would be in jail. Violence should not be tolerated
in the NBA or any other setting.
How Can Sports Psychologists Help?
Results of psychological assessment and personality
profile of athletes conducted by team sport psychologists can help coaches
and management in the selection process and team building. Some personality
types have more of a tendency to have impulsive, aggressive behaviors
than others. A recent study conducted by Dr. Cristina Versari, a sport
psychologist and career consultant, demonstrated that the personality
type of athletes can help predict players behavior and performance. Her
study included professional basketball players, olympic, and high school
athletes.
Involving sport psychologists in the area of violence
in sport would not only be beneficial to the athletes, but also to the
players and management. Helping to predict behavior and implementing certain
methods that would help with team building would have a positive impact
on the entire organization.
02/15/98
Clair Alvies is currently attending San Diego
University for Integrative Studies in San Diego, California and is in
the process of completing requirements for a Ph.D. in Sport Psychology.
She received her Bachelor's from U.C.S.D. While attending U.C.S.D. she
played on the intercollegiate softball team. Wanting to stay active
in the sports scene, she coached the Varsity Softball Teams at Clairemont
High School and University of San Diego High School.
Clair Alvies can be contacted at alvies@mciworld.com
or sduis@sduis.edu.
back to articles
|